|
The Scarlet Woman (Revelation 17) Revelation 17:1-3
"And there came one of the seven angels that had the seven bowls, and spake
with me, saying, Come hither, I will show thee the judgment of the great harlot
that sitteth upon many waters; 2 with whom the kings of the earth committed
fornication, and they that dwell in the earth were made drunken with the wine of
her fornication."
Chapter 17 opens with one of the angels bearing
God's bowls of wrath coming near to John with the intention of showing him the "judgment
of the great harlot that sitteth on many waters." The King James version
refers to this woman as a "whore." There is some dispute in the
religious world today as to who is to be the recipient of God's wrath as
pictured in the Revelation. When looking at the characteristics of this woman
and comparing her to what we know of the Roman Empire, there can be little doubt
as to who this infamous woman represents. The angel goes to great lengths to
identify her throughout the chapter. In verse 18, the angel removes all doubt
as to who this woman is.
Revelation 17:18
"And the woman whom thou sawest is the
great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth."
There was only one city on earth in the time of
John's letter that fit that description. The woman can only be the city of
Rome. So with this in mind, we will look at the characteristics of this woman
and examine just how closely she really resembles the imperial city.
She is introduced as a "harlot" in verse 1. In
verse 5 she is labeled on her forehead as the "Mother of the harlots." Being
the mother of harlots means being responsible for the procreation of
harlots. Harlotry in this case being descriptive of spiritual fornication or
unfaithfulness to the Lord (Ezekiel 16,
Jeremiah 2:1,
Hosea 1:1). Imperial Rome compelled the conquered kings to enter into
fornication with her in the form of emperor worship and she tried to force it
upon her citizenry. Thus we have the imagery of a woman who by her actions
spawned spiritual harlots who worshipped the emperor instead of Jehovah.
The "many waters" upon which the scarlet woman
sits is explained in verse 15: "And he saith unto me, The waters which thou
sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and
tongues." This leads right into verse 2 where the angel says "with whom
the kings of the earth have committed fornication." The key words being "with
whom." The imagery here is that the rulers of the people represented by the
"many waters" were guilty of fornication with the "mother of harlots"
and they were specifically mentioned by the angel, signifying this was coming
from the highest levels of government. The spiritual fornication in view here
was mandated from the leadership of the people down to the citizenry.
Revelation 17:3
"And he carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness: and I saw a woman
sitting upon a scarlet-colored beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven
heads and ten horns."
In the vision, the angel removes John from where he was and takes him into a
wilderness where he sees "a woman." The question immediately arises, is
this the same woman previously mentioned? A closer examination of her
characteristics reveals that she is bedecked with those items signifying
royalty. Verse 4 describes her in terms of being "arrayed in purple
(meaning royalty) and scarlet (meaning deadly), and decked with gold
and precious stone and pearls." This is most certainly an image of the top
of the hierarchy of Roman authority. The woman in view here is representative
of none other than the Roman emperor himself.
"...[S]itting upon a scarlet colored
beast...." This beast bears a striking resemblance to the beast mentioned in
Revelation 13:1. The scarlet color would indicate that
the beast was deadly and wicked. Like the previous beast, this one has seven
heads and ten horns. The seven heads are later described in Revelation 17:9-10,
"Here is the mind that hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on
which the woman sitteth: and they are seven kings...." We don't need to
speculate any on what this means. It obviously refers to the emperors of the
Roman Empire.
The "ten horns" are explained in verse
12: "And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings." The Roman Empire
as a republic was organized as a provincial government. Each province was ruled
by a governor appointed by the Emperor. There were many more than just ten
provinces in the Roman Empire, and there were not exactly seven emperors at the
time of John's letter. A figurative view of the imagery would be that the beast
had 7 (perfect) heads and 10 (complete) horns (authority). The imagery will be
something that is easily pictured in the imaginations the first readers. It is
likely the complete sum of all the Roman provinces were represented by the
number ten with the seven mountains which were also kings being the Emperors
reigning over the kings of the provinces. The discussion of the ten horns is
taken up in more detail later in this study.
"Full of the names of blasphemy"
would be a reference to the names the beast called himself. Domitian, during
his reign issued his decrees as "Lord God Domitianus" and such. Therefore it
would have been unmistakable in the minds of the first readers of John's letter
that he was referring to the emperor.
Revelation 17:4
"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and decked with gold and
precious stone and pearls, having in her hand a golden cup full of abominations,
even the unclean things of her fornication,"
The woman sitting on the beast is arrayed in
royal trappings. This imagery is descriptive of the Roman leadership. She is
carrying a "golden cup full of abominations". In verse 6 we see that
this woman is "drunken in the blood of the saints and with the blood of the
martyrs of Jesus" signifying some of the contents of the golden cup. The "unclean
things of her fornication" would represent all the evils which have come
from her idolatry and persecution.
Revelation 17:5-6
"And upon her forehead a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER
OF THE HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. 6 And I saw the woman
drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of
Jesus. And when I saw her, I wondered with a great wonder."
God is giving this description as an
identification of the scarlet woman. She is the main harlot of John's
Revelation, she is the main one responsible for idolatry, referred to as the "mother
of the harlots." Moreover, this woman delights to drink or partake of the
blood of God's saints. This certainly fits the emperor of Rome and his severe
oppression of the 1st century Christians. She has spilled so much blood and
partaken of so much bloodshed that she is intoxicated by it. The blood of the
saints is all over her. The scarlet woman's identity is best determined by the
explanation given to John by the angel beginning in verse 7.
Revelation 17:7-8
"And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou wonder? I will tell thee
the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the
seven heads and the ten horns. 8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and
is about to come up out of the abyss, and to go into perdition. And they that
dwell on the earth shall wonder, (they) whose name hath not been written in the
book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast, how
that he was, and is not, and shall come. "
"The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and
is about to come up out of the abyss, and to go into perdition."
The beast that was and is not and is
about to come and then go is probably a reference to the changing leadership of
the Empire. Emperors came and emperors went. It is obvious that the imagery
here is one of the changing nature of the beast. The line of evil Roman
emperors certainly fits this description. History records that there was some
controversy around the death of Nero. Many people doubted that he was really
dead from suicide. It was suspected that he actually fled to Parthia where he
was gathering an army from among them to return to Rome and unseat whatever
emperor was in control and rule over the Roman Empire again. Domitian claimed
in his early years as emperor to be Nero returned so it was a common
superstition among the people of the time that Domitian was thought to be Nero
either returned or reincarnated. The allusion to the "was, and is not; and
is about to come" certainly appears to fit the text. We must keep in mind
the writer is appealing to the imaginations of his first readers and they would
certainly be familiar with the general superstitions and be able to understand
what was being illustrated here.
"And they that dwell on the earth shall wonder,
(they) whose name hath not been written in the book of life from the foundation
of the world"
Obviously those who never had their names
written in the book of life is a reference to the infidels. Their "wonder"
may be an expression of amazement at the beast's vitality and ability to die or
disappear and then return in another form to continue his deadly designs on the
Christians. Those who do have their names written in the book of life (the
faithful) understand that as terrible and tenacious as the beast appears to be,
his end is going to be perdition. The Greek word for perdition here means
destruction, utter ruin and loss of well being. This also fits well with the
superstitions of a returning Nero as Domitian who would rule again and then
disappear into ruin.
Revelation 17:9-11
"Here is the mind that hath wisdom. The
seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth: 10 and they are
seven kings; the five are fallen, the one is, the other is not yet come; and
when he cometh, he must continue a little while. 11 And the beast that was, and
is not, is himself also an eighth, and is of the seven; and he goeth into
perdition."
This student of Revelation has pored and
pondered and studied these three verses in depth for the past 2 months and I
still don't know for certain what they mean. My studies have further revealed
that I am not alone in this. I have seen numerous interpretations of this to no
avail. All that is for certain is that this is in reference to fallen leaders
of the Roman empire and the correct interpretation would likely give us an
invaluable clue as to the date of the writing of this book. Following is my
closest "guess" as to what this means and is aimed at being taken for what it's
worth.
The seven heads of the beast were seven heads of
the Roman empire. The first emperor who was emperor under constitutional law
was Augustus. He was the first one that was elected by the senate and approved
by the military. Election and military approval were necessary by Roman law.
Julius Caesar was a dictator before Rome was a republic and was only in office
because of popular demand. He was never legally appointed to his position under
constitutional law. So with this in mind, we start our counting with the first
legally elected head of the Roman Empire, as a republic, under the government in
force at the time of the writing of John's revelation.
The first five emperors are Augustus
(26BC-13AD), Tiberius (14AD-37AD), Caligula (37AD-41AD), Claudius (41AD-64AD)
and Nero (64AD-68AD). Verse 10 says these five are fallen thus out of the
picture. "The one is" in verse 10 would be Vespasian, the sixth
king/emperor, who ruled from 69AD-79AD. The "other is not yet come; and when
he cometh, he must continue a little while" would be Titus who only reigned
from 79AD-81. His reign was short, only a "little while", and he was the
seventh king. Now we come to the king in verse 11 who is the "eighth".
This is the first mention of this king, who would have been Domitian. He is the
one that "was and is not" which refers back to Domitian's claim that he
was the reincarnation of Nero. Also the eighth king was "of the seven"
which means that he was related to them. Domitian was the brother of Titus and
the son of Vespasian of the Flavian dynasty.
Clearly the text appears by all points to date
the writing of the Revelation during the reign of Vespasian. This creates a
difficulty in that tradition places John on the island of Patmos when the letter
was written, having been exiled there by Domitian himself. The Revelation is
believed by the majority of scholars to have been written toward the end of
Domitian's reign based largely on secular writings. There are some difficulties
with John writing the revelation at that time, chiefly that one must ask what
good it would do to write the book in 95-96AD, when the fiercest persecutions
were almost over? Additionally, how much time would it take to copy and
distribute this letter to the churches in Asia to which the letter was
addressed?
Here is a possible explanation. Secular writing
states that "Revelation was written in the days of Domitian." It's hard to tell
in the original Greek if that means it was WRITTEN then or SEEN
then. John could have been sent to Patmos by the local authorities there in
Ephesus rather than by Vespasian himself sometime during his reign. The
Gnostics in Ephesus felt John was causing problems as he was exposing the error
of their thinking. John being on Patmos during Vespasian’s reign would make the
writing of the book in the late 70’s very possible. John may have still been
there during the reign of Titus and then allowed back to the mainland around 81
AD. The book at that point could have been copied and dispersed to the churches
in Asia to be "SEEN in the days of Domitian." Domitian’s worst
persecutions started later into his reign, so that would have given the
Christians time to read the book and know what was coming "shortly" and
help them get ready for the intense persecutions to come.
Revelation 17:12-13
"And the ten horns that thou sawest are ten kings, who have received no
kingdom as yet; but they receive authority as kings, with the beast, for one
hour. 13 These have one mind, and they give their power and authority unto the
beast."
This is an explanation of the of the ten horns
of the beast mentioned back in verse 3. The ten horns represent the power of
the empire which was concentrated in the provinces and not in the city of Rome
herself. The ten kings who had not yet received a kingdom were the vassal
kings/leaders who ruled over the provinces and received authority from Rome,
basking in this authority for a short period of time (one hour). These vassal
kings realizing their power and authority came directly from Rome were eager to
please those in power in the imperial city. This would explain why they were so
zealous to persecute Christians. When recruited by Rome to respond to
insurrection they viewed the Christians as easy targets, thus being able to
curry the favor of the Emperor easily. Leaders of Provinces ruled longer with
the favor of the emperor.
Daniel prophecies of a great beast in
Daniel 7:23, "Thus he said, The
fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from
all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and
break it in pieces." The "beast" of Daniel is the same as the "beast" of
Revelation. This is an unmistakable reference to the Roman Empire. No other
empire fitting this description devoured the whole earth. Daniel goes on to say
that out of this 4th kingdom will arise one who will "speak great words
against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think
to change times and laws" (Daniel
7:25). This can be no other person but an emperor of the 4th kingdom; The
beast of Daniel; the beast of Revelation. No other imagery would come to mind
in the imaginations of the first readers of Revelation.
Revelation 17:14
"These shall war against the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them, for he
is Lord of lords, and King of kings; and they (also shall overcome) that are
with him, called and chosen and faithful."
The leaders of these provinces rose up against
the Christians to the call of the Imperial city. However, the faithful
Christians, against all odds will prevail against them and win in the end. The
lamb in this verse is obviously Jesus who was portrayed in other New Testament
as a lamb (John 1:29;
1:36).
Revelation 17:15
"And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the harlot
sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues."
This was the explanation of the waters upon
which the harlot sat, given to John by the angel in verse 1. Commentaries on
Revelation are a lot easier when it explains itself from within. There is
little room for error in such instances.
Revelation 17:16
"And the ten horns which thou sawest, and the beast, these shall hate the
harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and
shall burn her utterly with fire."
The kings of the provinces will ultimately turn
against Rome. One of Rome's greatest fears was insurrection and turmoil in the
provinces. History records that is precisely what happened to the Roman
Empire. She was defeated from within by her own subjects.
Revelation 17:17
"For God did put in their hearts to do his mind, and to come to one mind, and
to give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God should be
accomplished."
This was John's way of saying,
"God's will be done." To ask how God did this is but an exercise in futility.
Throughout history God used men and nations to carry out His purpose. He could
turn a nation to fighting within itself, as in the case of Midian during the
time of Gideon (Judges 7:22), and of
the Philistines in the days of Saul (1
Samuel 14:20). In the battle of Moab and Ammon against Mount Sier, God gave
victory to king Jehoshaphat without the army of Judah lifting a sword (2
Chronicles 20:23). God's objective of putting in the hearts of the kings in
Revelation 17 to do his mind is merely an example of His divine guidance in
everything. God is in charge and His will shall be accomplished. Not one word
shall fail, all will come to pass.
Revelation 17:18
"And the woman whom thou sawest is the great city, which reigneth over the
kings of the earth."
If one shred of doubt remains as to the identity
of this woman, it should here be solved once and for all. This verse was
mentioned at the onset of the study on chapter 17 in order to give a positive
identification to her identity for the purpose of firmly establishing who she
was in our minds as we work through the text. The woman is here identified for
us as the "city that reigneth over the kings of the earth." Rome ruled
her empire through a government system made up of several geographic territories
called provinces. Each province fell under the control of a provincial governor.
The governors of these provinces were completely at the whim of the Emperor and
could serve from 1 to 5 years. There were about 28 imperial provinces at the
height of the empire. All of these provinces were subject to Roman rule.
There is some thinking in the brotherhood that
names the Jewish nation as the recipients of God's wrath in the revelation and
that it pertains to the destruction of Jerusalem in AD70. Jerusalem did not
reign over the kings of the earth. The Jews were in God's disfavor from their
rejection of Christ and His Gospel message. They were ruling over nothing,
rather being a vassal nation within the Roman Empire and they were crushed
because of their revolt against Roman authority.
God's judgment was coming on the "great
harlot that sitteth on many waters" (Revelation 17:1).
There can be no doubt this is referring to the Imperial City of Rome. She with
"whom the kings of the earth committed fornication" (17:2);
She who was "drunken with the blood of the saints" (17:6);
She who was the "Mother of the Harlots" (17:5);
and she who is "the city which reigneth over the kings of the earth" (Revelation
17:18).
The Downfall of Imperial Rome
Such great significance has been attached to
Imperial Rome as the center of the persecuting power toward Christianity in the
latter half of the first century, that three chapters of the Revelation are
given to portray her downfall. Chapter 17 appears to be intent on identifying
Rome as the recipient of God's judgment and portraying just how evil an
adversary she is to the saints. Verse 14 reassures the Christians that God will
be victorious in the end. Those who are "called and chosen and faithful"
will overcome and emerge victorious.
|